Why Chelsea FC Has No Shirt Sponsor ? ?⚽️ #football #chelseafc #shorts

50 pensamientos sobre “Why Chelsea FC Has No Shirt Sponsor ? ?⚽️ #football #chelseafc #shorts”

1. The Chelsea logo looks goofy since you can’t see it

2. No they dont

3. Cleeannn

4. It’s £52m per season so $60m, not $40m

5. He live hi khawi channel mi nge ka hre miah lo na chu,mahse he channel ami hi chu anilo chiang a,,post dang pawh hi mi content chu a tam ve ta khawp mai,mahse engtin nge heng video post hma a permission neih dan chu ka hrelo,mahse he channel hi a thang chak reuh khawp mai,6 days ago a i video ah,road to 50k i ti a,tunah chuan 52 a thleng der mai,anyway,congrats?

6. Chelsea kit is so bad this season what you talking about

7. Chelsea a big club?

   I prefer this no sponsor kit. Looks great

8. 100th comment

9. Chelsea is a small club with 41,000 capacity. I hope Caicedo and lavia flop .
   #ynwa

10. i did yo mom

11. their kit looks like shit! what are u on fam?!

12. It looks so good on Enzo Fernandez

13. I legitimately spent an hour looking for the inter shirt wit no Logo. Still haven’t found one ?

14. 50 million

15. £40million not dollars.

16. No sponsor kits look so bland and boring.

17. The kit looks cleaner tho

18. Chelsea will use that sponsor on their away kit and third(most likely)

19. Looks 100x better without a sponsor should give u a choice when u buy the kit with or without sponsors

20. Correction it's £50 million

21. Without sponsor it looks soo good

22. Lets be real, all football kits without sponsor look fire !

23. Chelsea without a sponsor look like a kit that you would find PES efootball.

24. No bias but Chelsea’s kit this season is ugly asf, I hate that texture with the badge and shit

25. 7500th like❤

26. actually it's worth 50mil my guy

27. No, it doesn't. ?

28. Alll kits look so good without the sponsors

29. Can’t approve TV streaming companies but will happily approve tons of betting companies ?‍♂️

30. Chelsea kit this season is ?? without a sponsor

31. bro what those kits look weird as hell looks like them chelsea kits created in Pes 2021 because they didnt have the rights for the culb

32. Its actually 50 mill. 3 was their sponsor for 40 mill. And considering no champions league, 50 is better than 40. How did they pull this off?

33. God forbid

34. Check the Facts £50 million a Year .

35. If i remember its the same company that sponsored major league cricket a while ago.

36. If I trick you you have to pin me and like. Read more…

37. Guys remember when barca didnt have sponsors, good old times when the only think they had on their shirts was unicef

38. Sponsors are getting uglier each year. And even more randoom, who gives a fuck about that company

39. Look pes

40. barca and schalke also dont have sponsor before..i think roma also dont have sponsor

41. All kits without sponsors look better and more simple

42. I don’t get how people actually like these kits. They look absolutely horrid

43. 'Chelsea a big club'?

44. Thats how kits are supposed to look?

45. Big club? No bottom half team is big

46. Are u ever gonna go back to the Og voice and logo

47. It looks soo good at begining i thinked its Rangers

48. U give a fun fact from nowhere . Always ?

49. I thought they were waiting for LGBTQ+ sponsorship.

    Fcuking rainbow ? soldiers.

    I'm a Chelsea fan, but i hate this side of us.

50. The inter and Chelsea kits look so good w no sponser

Los comentarios están cerrados.