Why Are There So Many of EVERYTHING On Battleships?



In this episode we’re talking about redundancy on board certain types of ships.

For our video on casualty power:

To support the battleship’s efforts to drydock, go to:

For the most recent updates to the project, go to:

Puedes comprar todas las camisetas oficiales de fútbol en futbolmania, la tienda de las mejores Camisetas de fútbol – Devolución gratis.

38 pensamientos sobre “Why Are There So Many of EVERYTHING On Battleships?

  1. Thank God the LCS' will all be de-commissioned soon! That program was the biggest waste of money in U.S. Navy history. They could have directed those billions to a modernization program for the Perrys. Instead, they spent money scrapping those, BILLIONS on the utterly useless LCS program, and, now, they have to spend even more to get rid of them, and, replace them with a whole new class of proper FFG.

  2. One HUGE fact you have to remember – each LCS weighs roughly ONE of New Jersey's TURRETS. They're 3,500 ton Frigates/Corvettes, but they still carry plenty of redundancy: two main propulsion diesels and two gas turbines split between two watertight spaces, four diesel generators with switchboards split between two watertight spaces, critical equipment has battery backup, most ship's systems can be controlled from each of the four damage control lockers in addition to the bridge, etc. You're completely correct in saying there are no hands cranks to be found though.

    Gah, the lack of consistency due to self- serving politics in the LCS naming drives me nuts. Independence and Freedom are fine, if you're going to maintain the pattern. Cooperstown and Billings are great, if you maintain the pattern. Gabby Gifford? C'mon…

  3. My wife and I toured this ship last week. What a piece of work. So rugged and much larger than I thought it was on the inside. And the wiring….. holy cow. Cudos for the museum crew! This must've been no small project. Great video (as always).

  4. Of all the battleships sunk since the start of WW I, I wonder how many were sunk by torpedoes, how many by bombs dropped from planes, and how many by shells fired from other battleships or cruisers.

  5. im reminded of Star Trek DS9 episode.
    O'BRIEN: Well, in order to bring the system up to Starfleet code, I had to take out the couplings to make room for a secondary backup.
    GILORA: Starfleet code requires a second backup?
    O'BRIEN: In case the first backup fails.
    GILORA: What are the chances that both a primary system and its backup would fail at the same time?
    O'BRIEN: It's very unlikely, but in a crunch I wouldn't like to be caught without a second backup.

  6. Redundancy isn't found just on battleships. The first computer system I worked on in the USAF had multiple backups. We had logic A and B. Either alone or any combination and the system worked. Plus we had offline spares for each drawer, power supply, keyboard, printer, and modem. We had two keyboards and printers. If one printer was down, a message addressed to it would be printed on the other printer. We had two dedicated telephone lines. We had a backup diesel generator incase we lost commercial power. I think that qualifies as a very redundant system.

  7. Thanks for another great video. Question… what was the process for flooding a magazine? How many locations could it be done from and how quickly would the process take? Thanks again and keep up the great work.

  8. Ryan
    As an ex navy electricians mate, I'm afraid I freaked out when you stuck that emergency power cable lead into that EP receptacle.
    I've been out for 40+ years, and I still respect the danger those "biscuits" represent.

  9. There was an also a redundancy in personnel. There were so many crew on an Iowa Battleship that it was easy for someone to man a station if the main system went down. It’s harder to do with a smaller crew since you can quickly run out of personnel.

  10. I’ve always wondered why none of the ships had a rudder on the bow. It’s not like loss of rudder control has never happened. I remember hearing that Vanguard considered installing one but they found it didn’t work as well as they thought it would and so it was deleted. This reasoning didn’t ring true to me as some control would be better than none in an emergency. It also potentially could turn the ship faster than just a stern rudder or 2.

  11. The comparison wouldn't be fair. An Iowa could just ram an LCS and sink it. Chances are the engines for the LCS wouldn't be working nor the guns have any ammo. There should be some court martials and keel hauling for people behind that program.

Los comentarios están cerrados.